Hex-Chrome-6

The Monterey County Health Department has a "Drinking Water Protection Services" Program. The part of that program I'm familiar with is related to Well Water in Monterey County and I believe that is their only major focus, based on the youtube video found at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d8m3Ibq0__0 . ( or access my copy here )

Should well water from areas surrounded by commercial farms subjected to toxic fertilizer and chem trails ever be consumed without filtering?

No. Not at all. Not if it can be avoided one of several ways.

Can well water be consumed without filtering?

Yes people did it for years and decades and they still could/can, but it's no longer advisable. When they did it before we had a lot less known commercial carcinogens and no chemtrails though.

Should Monterey County or any California County care about monitoring well water for human "drinkability" straight from the ground ?

No. Absolutely not. They should issue a bulletin stating that well water from Monterey County should only be consumed after filtration given various risk factors.

They should then indicate which contaminant are most common, what filter are required for each contaminant, and where they can get their water tested to make sure they select a proper filter if they'd like to filter their own water.

Should Monterey County or any California County care about monitoring well water for contaminants?

Absolutely.

If livestock is being raised for food and it is drinking well water, it would make sense to monitor what my be getting consumed by the animals.

If there are contaminants that can be absorbed by teh skin on contact that would be important to monitor.

It would also be a good idea for purposes of monitoring for possible pollution by Corporate and independent farmers and their fertilizers and/or chem trail purveyors.

It would also be needed to know what type of filters to recommend to residents who want to drink their well water instead of buying filtered water in one form or another.

So why exactly are Monterey County citizens paying $112,000 per year to employ Cheryl Sandoval to monitor well water for drinking purposes?

Cheryl Sandoval
Mry County Enviro Health Specialist IV
Responsible fror Drinking Water Protection Services

Marni Flagg
Cheryl's Boss

Ric Encarnacion
Marni's Boss

Great question...

What I'm going to introduce in this expose is what I call a "completely fabricated industry" and a "work for benefits program" that has lost focus on the idea that busy work for county and state employees often times has massive negative consequences on the people paying for them to work in the first place. As an engineer and a highly efficient person, personally, I'd rather give free money to everyone and ask them not to work, while giving them health benefits, than to tell people they have to work for their benefits at the cost of subjecting them (and us) to these "fabricated industry" and "work for benefits" hoaxes, but that's just me -- although I hope you join me there sooner rather than later for sure. People left with a little money and a lot of time can become very creative and productive. People forced to work for their benefits can become toxic -- and that's at a bare minimu.

Without knowing the full history of Monterey County Health and this "Drinking Water Protection Services" section, , it's difficult to know if it started with Good Intentions or not . I can imagine a time before readily available and affordable filtration was around that this may have all made sense. But when would that have ended? the 1980s or so?

However, what is has progressed to now definitely appears to be a collection of people getting paid far too much money to make it easy for them to find replacement work -- and to secure their jobs when the work is not remotely needed in current form -- they are now participating in very concerning and probably illegal activities to make sure they stay employed.

And when people get pushed into that situation, they become targes for manipulation by their own bosses, evil Corporations and other stakeholders -- and that leads to quagmires related to legislative manipulations they would never have agreed with as young adults -- and the granting of access to our personal property data that they can all use for self gratifying means.

All that combined translates into an unregulated tax on time and money for the citizens who are already overburdened with supporting a bureaucracy gone rogue. With this we are just putting a few faces on it to make it more clear just how bad it's gotten.

For what it's worth, it's okay if you don't agree with me on this for now. Just understand that is one of several conclusions I came to after collecting these facts over 6 years, but it's not the only relevant conclusion I came to. Some are far, far worse. One other happens to be a seemingly very active participation in the mental torture of a well liked Doctor by Sandoval and Encarnacion, but we'll get to that soon enough.

Background on Montrerey County and California Wells

Community Wells with more than 15 connections are required to do various levels of water treatment. This is a very questionable requirement and program given people in the country who live on wells have always known well water needs to be treated or boiled if consumed, however it has been in place for some time. The full history of this program and dates of implementation are not known at this time.

Does it make sense to treat all water pulled from the ground for purposes of consumption when only a tiny portion of it goes towards consumption?

There is no reason to treat water used for showers, bathing, boiing or gardening/vegetation and/or live stock.

There is no reason to treat water used to flush pee and poop down the toilet

What percent of filtered water entering a home is actually consumed?

Community Wells with less than 15 connections are not currently subject to mandatory water treatment, BUT owners are required to register the well systems with the County, and at some point in the past, "quarterly courtesy testing" for bacteria was implemented.

Since that time there has been a push to test for "nitrates". That testing comes and goes. That testing has been done under this "quarterly courtesy testing" process and the results were used to attempt to force water purification for drinking purposes on these systems, when the people on the system themselves have no expectations or desire for forced treatment of all water coming to their property.

Now there is a new push for Hexavalent Chromium 6 (aka Hex Chrome / Hex Chrome 6 / Chromium 6) that was initially started in the early 2010s without the proper, open process for Scientific Paper Review.

Then, 5 years later when such a requirement must be reviewed Scientifically, the program was pulled. The reason for the pull was said to be the result of a court case, but it's believed at this time that may have been a hoax legal process to distract from the fraudulent implementation of the program to start with.

Now it's being re-implemented again, but it was just discovered that the 1st test for Hex Chrome came from a "mysterious grant" -- and the presentation fo the results on the quarterly reporrts has been very confusing , in a very bad way. The reporting seems to expose something that needs to be reviewed further...

< to be continued -- More soon.... very soon... >